Page 119 of Hush
“So you wouldn’t, for example, have any idea that Vadim Kryukov’s criminal past consisted entirely of the Russian government targeting him for being homosexual? Or that he’d engaged in legitimate protests, supported by the U.S. State Department, against the Putin regime?”
“Objection!” Ballard stood quickly. “There’s no foundation to this question. Agent Payne has already answered that he didn’t ask any questions and didn’t know any details. He wouldn’t know this, and defense is verging on harassing my witness.”
Tom exhaled slowly. His gaze flicked between Renner and Ballard. Ballard was technically correct. Renner had scored points, though, sliding his information in, couched as a question. He’d exposed a whole new angle to the trial. Tom felt his sympathies rising, inappropriate emotions spreading. To be gay in Putin—or Vasiliev’s—Russia. If nothing else, Renner had shown his client to be sympathetic, a victim, an underdog.
And—dangerously—he’d highlighted a possible motive. His move was a gamble. Where was he going with this line of questioning?
Part of him wanted to know. But the law was the law. “Sustained. Ask another question, counselor.”
“What did you do when you placed my client on the watch list? What actions did you take?”
“He was put under surveillance. Secret Service agents went to him and asked him his intentions during the forthcoming Russian president’s visit.”
“And what did he say?”
“He said he was going to, quote, ‘legally and legitimately protest that bastard’, as was his right.”
Renner grinned. “Vadim certainly has a fire about him.”
Smart. Making the defendant human. Tom eyed the jury. They were hanging on Renner’s every word.
Renner continued. “And, did you ask what he meant by that statement?”
“Yes.”
“And what did he mean?”
“He said he would be protesting on the National Mall outside the Capitol when the Russian president visited Congress.”
“How did he know the Russian president was visiting Congress?”
“It was publicly available information.”
“So, Mr. Kryukov did not need to inform Bulat Desheriyev of this fact?”
“Objection!” Ballard rose again. “Calls for speculation.”
“On the contrary, I’m asking the agent’s professional investigative opinion about whether my client would have had any reason whatsoever to text what he allegedly texted.”
“And,” Ballard added. “No predicate for this line of questioning.”
No predicate. The crime had not been laid out in its entirety yet. The facts of the crime and the timeline of events were still being exposed. The text that Kryukov had sent to Desheriyev hadn’t yet been entered into evidence by the prosecution. Discussing it in opening statements was not good enough. If this was how the first hour of testimony was playing out, how would the rest of the trial go? “Sustained.” He tried to catch Ballard’s eye, but Ballard sat down immediately and reached for his notes.
Renner smiled, totally unruffled. “Did you see Vadim Kryukov at the protest on the National Mall, in front of the Capitol?”
“Yes.”
Tom’s memories surged back. Vadim, his long blond hair hanging on the sides of his face, bellowing into a megaphone. Screaming in the crowd, urging the crowd to chant more, louder, cry out to Vasiliev. The effigy, a paper doll of the Russian president hoisted aloft in a tutu, covered in lipstick kisses. Something Vadim had said, in Russian, that had made every Russian agent’s head turn.
“So, Vadim Kryukov was exercising his legal and legitimate right to protest the Russian president, and his policies, in a legal gathering before the Capitol. Doesn’t seem like he was making any move to hide his anti-Vasiliev beliefs, does he?”
“Objection! Calls for speculation, again.”
“Counselor.” Tom leaned forward, peering at Renner. Renner’s eyes shone. He knew he’d done wrong, but he was pushing the envelope, going as far as Ballard’s patience and Tom’s leniency would allow. “You can take better care with crafting your questions. This is a court of law, not a stage.”
“Apologies, Your Honor.” Another slick smile. Renner turned to Payne. “Did you know that the protesters on the National Mall that day were gay pride marchers?”
“No.”
Table of Contents
- Page 1
- Page 2
- Page 3
- Page 4
- Page 5
- Page 6
- Page 7
- Page 8
- Page 9
- Page 10
- Page 11
- Page 12
- Page 13
- Page 14
- Page 15
- Page 16
- Page 17
- Page 18
- Page 19
- Page 20
- Page 21
- Page 22
- Page 23
- Page 24
- Page 25
- Page 26
- Page 27
- Page 28
- Page 29
- Page 30
- Page 31
- Page 32
- Page 33
- Page 34
- Page 35
- Page 36
- Page 37
- Page 38
- Page 39
- Page 40
- Page 41
- Page 42
- Page 43
- Page 44
- Page 45
- Page 46
- Page 47
- Page 48
- Page 49
- Page 50
- Page 51
- Page 52
- Page 53
- Page 54
- Page 55
- Page 56
- Page 57
- Page 58
- Page 59
- Page 60
- Page 61
- Page 62
- Page 63
- Page 64
- Page 65
- Page 66
- Page 67
- Page 68
- Page 69
- Page 70
- Page 71
- Page 72
- Page 73
- Page 74
- Page 75
- Page 76
- Page 77
- Page 78
- Page 79
- Page 80
- Page 81
- Page 82
- Page 83
- Page 84
- Page 85
- Page 86
- Page 87
- Page 88
- Page 89
- Page 90
- Page 91
- Page 92
- Page 93
- Page 94
- Page 95
- Page 96
- Page 97
- Page 98
- Page 99
- Page 100
- Page 101
- Page 102
- Page 103
- Page 104
- Page 105
- Page 106
- Page 107
- Page 108
- Page 109
- Page 110
- Page 111
- Page 112
- Page 113
- Page 114
- Page 115
- Page 116
- Page 117
- Page 118
- Page 119 (reading here)
- Page 120
- Page 121
- Page 122
- Page 123
- Page 124
- Page 125
- Page 126
- Page 127
- Page 128
- Page 129
- Page 130
- Page 131
- Page 132
- Page 133
- Page 134
- Page 135
- Page 136
- Page 137
- Page 138
- Page 139
- Page 140
- Page 141
- Page 142
- Page 143
- Page 144
- Page 145
- Page 146
- Page 147
- Page 148
- Page 149
- Page 150
- Page 151
- Page 152
- Page 153
- Page 154
- Page 155
- Page 156
- Page 157
- Page 158
- Page 159
- Page 160
- Page 161
- Page 162
- Page 163
- Page 164
- Page 165
- Page 166
- Page 167
- Page 168
- Page 169
- Page 170
- Page 171
- Page 172
- Page 173
- Page 174