Page 95 of Cry Havoc
Then came plates with a selection of cheeses. Gaston chose a 1963 Quinta do Noval port to go with them.
“An homage to the Portuguese. They were the first Europeans to arrive in Vietnam in the sixteenth century,” he explained. “I often lunch with the Portuguese ambassador at the Cercle Sportif, which has the side benefit of access to bottles of otherwise difficult to obtain vintage port.”
The finale was dessert: small chocolate profiteroles, a French pastry with sweet cream filling, served with coffee in the smallest coffee cups Tom had ever seen. Two sugar cubes offset the bitter taste.
The meal had taken over three hours.
Ella lit up a long cigarette, so Tom took the opportunity to do the same, the nicotine putting just the right finishing touch to the evening’s meal.
Serrano stirred both his sugar cubes into his small cup.
“Monsieur DuBois,” he said. “I was hoping you might share with us your thoughts on Tet.”
“You know,” Gaston said. “Some used to say the French owned Vietnam because they civilized it. It ended up not working out for the French. Tet gives us a window into the future. America will be next.”
“We hear reports that the NVA lost a generation of fighters,” Serrano said.
“I understand that it was primarily Viet Cong, but the North will just replenish them with NVA. And, yes, they suffered staggering losses, yet you are not any closer to achieving your objectives than you were three years ago when you flooded the country with troops. They hit over one hundred cities and are still fighting in many of them.”
“Do you believe the war is going to become both a conventional battle and an insurgency?”
“Westmoreland wants a conventional war. He toldTimemagazine that he hoped the communists would try something, because he was lookingfor a fight. He seems to have gotten his wish. In a speech not long after, he said that the communists were unable to mount a major offensive. He was wrong.”
“Some say that the Viet Cong are about to enter what is called a third phase of the war, transitioning from guerrilla tactics to large-scale conventional engagements.”
“And why would they do that, Mr. Serrano? Why would they suddenly switch to the methods of warfare in which their enemy so obviously excels? Their guerrilla tactics have been successful. Why change a winning strategy? Your generals may hope with all their hearts that they get to fight the NVA and VC in another D-Day, but it is not to be. Not in Vietnam.”
“We are learning tough lessons.”
“Mr. Smith, what did you learn from Tet?”
Tom cleared his throat.
“Well, it illustrates that the NVA can plan and coordinate. They hit the embassy to show we are vulnerable. It revealed the popular support for the VC, and it highlighted their courage,” Tom added.
“Excuse me?” Gaston said.
“It takes courage to take on the U.S.”
“It does. Gentlemen, if I may.”
“Please,” Serrano said.
“They have been studying you. They infiltrated the cities. You had been telling the world that the cities were safe. The VC and NVA proved you wrong. That may very well end up being the most lasting impact of Tet. Mr. Smith, do you know what District Eight is?”
“No.”
“It was the gold standard, an area of Saigon built up by the Americans. It’s where Westmoreland took visiting senators to showcase what was possible in Vietnam. Homes were built with none of the overcrowding found in most of the city—clean water, electricity, TVs, refrigerators. And today it is in ruins. Ho and Giap knew if they had a VC presence there as part ofTet then the American military would destroy it for them, along with the pipe dream that it could become a reality for all Vietnam. The Viet Minh used a similar tactic in Hanoi against the French in ’46. Both in Hanoi and Saigon the results were the same: gunships, artillery, destruction. Now the people see the Americans, not the VC, as having destroyed their homes, killed their husband or wife, mother or father, son or daughter. How can you blame them? The VC don’t have helicopter gunships or bombers. The Americans do. You may have created more VC than you killed.”
“You may be right,” Tom agreed.
“The attacks around the country are important, but none are as important as what happened in Saigon. They proved they could hit the epicenter of American power in Vietnam, and they brought that victory into the living rooms of the American voter, showing them that American blood is being spilled here, not just in the hamlets, but in the heart of Saigon.”
“The press isn’t helping,” Serrano offered.
“Your press, Halberstam and Sheehan in particular, assassinated Diêm and Nhu on the page well before soldiers put bullets and knives to them in the back of an armored personnel carrier that was supposed to give them safe passage to the airport and out of the country in ’63. Killed in an accidental suicide, isn’t that right, Mr. Serrano? We may never know exactly what happened, but your Ambassador Lodge seemed to have a penchant for playing God. I do not know why neither Kennedy nor Johnson did not remove him earlier. That coup has come to haunt us all. Maybe they both feared Lodge would run against them for president? Or perhaps they intended to use him as a scapegoat for a failing war while at the same time marginalizing him politically? Regardless of the reason, that line of thinking backfired. Did Diêm’s ousting solve the Buddhist problem? It just exacerbated it with more monks self-immolating in the months after the coup than in all Diêm’s years as president. And where were thoseNew York TimesandWashington Postarticles then? Perhaps the truth no longer fit their purposes? Your press is complicit in thisstory, in the exacerbation of this war. And they are watching it play out from the roof of the Caravelle Hotel.”
“What is our biggest hurdle after Tet?” Serrano asked.
Table of Contents
- Page 1
- Page 2
- Page 3
- Page 4
- Page 5
- Page 6
- Page 7
- Page 8
- Page 9
- Page 10
- Page 11
- Page 12
- Page 13
- Page 14
- Page 15
- Page 16
- Page 17
- Page 18
- Page 19
- Page 20
- Page 21
- Page 22
- Page 23
- Page 24
- Page 25
- Page 26
- Page 27
- Page 28
- Page 29
- Page 30
- Page 31
- Page 32
- Page 33
- Page 34
- Page 35
- Page 36
- Page 37
- Page 38
- Page 39
- Page 40
- Page 41
- Page 42
- Page 43
- Page 44
- Page 45
- Page 46
- Page 47
- Page 48
- Page 49
- Page 50
- Page 51
- Page 52
- Page 53
- Page 54
- Page 55
- Page 56
- Page 57
- Page 58
- Page 59
- Page 60
- Page 61
- Page 62
- Page 63
- Page 64
- Page 65
- Page 66
- Page 67
- Page 68
- Page 69
- Page 70
- Page 71
- Page 72
- Page 73
- Page 74
- Page 75
- Page 76
- Page 77
- Page 78
- Page 79
- Page 80
- Page 81
- Page 82
- Page 83
- Page 84
- Page 85
- Page 86
- Page 87
- Page 88
- Page 89
- Page 90
- Page 91
- Page 92
- Page 93
- Page 94
- Page 95 (reading here)
- Page 96
- Page 97
- Page 98
- Page 99
- Page 100
- Page 101
- Page 102
- Page 103
- Page 104
- Page 105
- Page 106
- Page 107
- Page 108
- Page 109
- Page 110
- Page 111
- Page 112
- Page 113
- Page 114
- Page 115
- Page 116
- Page 117
- Page 118
- Page 119
- Page 120
- Page 121
- Page 122
- Page 123
- Page 124
- Page 125
- Page 126
- Page 127
- Page 128
- Page 129
- Page 130
- Page 131
- Page 132
- Page 133
- Page 134
- Page 135
- Page 136
- Page 137
- Page 138
- Page 139
- Page 140
- Page 141
- Page 142
- Page 143
- Page 144
- Page 145
- Page 146
- Page 147
- Page 148
- Page 149
- Page 150
- Page 151
- Page 152
- Page 153
- Page 154
- Page 155
- Page 156
- Page 157
- Page 158
- Page 159
- Page 160
- Page 161
- Page 162
- Page 163
- Page 164
- Page 165
- Page 166
- Page 167
- Page 168
- Page 169
- Page 170
- Page 171
- Page 172
- Page 173
- Page 174
- Page 175
- Page 176
- Page 177
- Page 178
- Page 179
- Page 180
- Page 181
- Page 182
- Page 183
- Page 184
- Page 185
- Page 186
- Page 187
- Page 188
- Page 189
- Page 190
- Page 191