Page 136 of After Anna
“No, who?”
“Anna—the imposter Anna, that is—made a friend at Lower Merion named Samantha Silas. Her mother spoke to me at the end of the funeral.” Maggie tried to think back. “She told me that Samantha ran away after Anna was murdered because she was so upset, and that she had run away before.”
“For real?”
“Yes.” Maggie felt her chest tighten, making a connection. “Anna’s only friend at high school, Samantha, runs away? And before that, Anna’s only friend at Congreve, Jamie, runs away? And now Anna, the real Anna, my daughter, is missing? Doesn’t that seem coincidental to you?”
“It does. I mean, what are the odds?” Kathy’s eyes rounded.
“I think that’s definitely something we should tell them. Ellen said they called the police, and we should lay it all out for them.”
“Yes, it gives them a place to start their investigation.”
“Yep.” Maggie bore down, steering through the rain. “It worries me though. I hate to think that Anna is missing. What’s happening with these girls?”
“We’re not cops.”
“No, but we’re moms on a mission.” Maggie looked over with a tense smile, and Kathy smiled back, equally tense.
“What happens to Noah, if this is true? He was convicted of killing Anna, but Anna isn’t dead.”
“I was wondering about that too. I don’t know what it means, legally. They don’t just let him go. I mean, that girl was murdered.” Maggie gripped the steering wheel. She glanced in the backseat to make sure Caleb wasn’t listening, and he was still ear-plugged into the video game. “Kathy, do me a favor, get my phone out of my purse, look up Neil Seligman, and call him? He’s one of the criminal lawyers I know from work. He might have the answer.”
“I’ll do it, you drive.” Kathy started digging in her purse, found the phone, and pressed in Neil’s number. “Got it.”
“Put him on speaker, okay?” Maggie drove while Kathy switched the phone to speaker, and it rang twice.
Neil picked up. “Hello?”
“Neil, this is Maggie Ippoliti. Got a minute?”
“Of course. I was thinking of you, reading about your husband’s conviction. This must be a very difficult time for you.”
“Yes it is, thank you. Do you have a minute to talk?”
“Of course.”
“Neil, I’m in a car with my best friend Kathy, and I have a question for you about my husband. Can I speak to you confidentially, as an attorney?”
“Certainly.”
“There’s been a surprising development in his case, and I’d like to get your opinion.” Maggie launched into the story about the phone call from Congreve and learning that the girl whom Noah had been convicted of killing wasn’t Anna. Caleb kept playing his video game, and they sped past billboards on the way to the airport. Trucks and vans sprayed water and road salt.
“So what do you think, Neil?” Maggie asked, when she was finished.
“Noah doesn’t get out of jail free. The fact that he was convicted of killing someone—let’s call her Jane Doe, but she was in reality, Susan Smith—is not relevant to his conviction, if the only new fact is just a mistaken identity.”
“I figured.” Maggie felt a pang.
“Under the doctrine of transferred intent, the intent to murder may be transferred where the person who was actually killed was not the intended victim. Think of it like a situation where someone shot at another person’s head with the intent to kill him, and that person ducked, and a third person was killed. You follow?”
“Yes,” Maggie and Kathy answered in unison.
“It’s still first-degree murder, despite the fact that the shooter did not intend to kill that person. The same would be true if someone put poison in someone’s coffee cup with the intent to kill that person, and a third person drank the coffee and died.”
“I understand.” Maggie saw they were closing in on the airport.
“So Noah is still guilty of first-degree murder. It’s not legally relevant if he was mistaken about the identity of the person he killed. Now, where the mistaken-identity issue could be helpful is if Noah can present substantial evidence that the person thought to be Jane Doe was actually killed by someone who wanted to kill Susan Smith and that person knew Jane Doe was Susan Smith. However, it would require evidence and not just speculation.”
Table of Contents
- Page 1
- Page 2
- Page 3
- Page 4
- Page 5
- Page 6
- Page 7
- Page 8
- Page 9
- Page 10
- Page 11
- Page 12
- Page 13
- Page 14
- Page 15
- Page 16
- Page 17
- Page 18
- Page 19
- Page 20
- Page 21
- Page 22
- Page 23
- Page 24
- Page 25
- Page 26
- Page 27
- Page 28
- Page 29
- Page 30
- Page 31
- Page 32
- Page 33
- Page 34
- Page 35
- Page 36
- Page 37
- Page 38
- Page 39
- Page 40
- Page 41
- Page 42
- Page 43
- Page 44
- Page 45
- Page 46
- Page 47
- Page 48
- Page 49
- Page 50
- Page 51
- Page 52
- Page 53
- Page 54
- Page 55
- Page 56
- Page 57
- Page 58
- Page 59
- Page 60
- Page 61
- Page 62
- Page 63
- Page 64
- Page 65
- Page 66
- Page 67
- Page 68
- Page 69
- Page 70
- Page 71
- Page 72
- Page 73
- Page 74
- Page 75
- Page 76
- Page 77
- Page 78
- Page 79
- Page 80
- Page 81
- Page 82
- Page 83
- Page 84
- Page 85
- Page 86
- Page 87
- Page 88
- Page 89
- Page 90
- Page 91
- Page 92
- Page 93
- Page 94
- Page 95
- Page 96
- Page 97
- Page 98
- Page 99
- Page 100
- Page 101
- Page 102
- Page 103
- Page 104
- Page 105
- Page 106
- Page 107
- Page 108
- Page 109
- Page 110
- Page 111
- Page 112
- Page 113
- Page 114
- Page 115
- Page 116
- Page 117
- Page 118
- Page 119
- Page 120
- Page 121
- Page 122
- Page 123
- Page 124
- Page 125
- Page 126
- Page 127
- Page 128
- Page 129
- Page 130
- Page 131
- Page 132
- Page 133
- Page 134
- Page 135
- Page 136 (reading here)
- Page 137
- Page 138
- Page 139
- Page 140
- Page 141
- Page 142
- Page 143
- Page 144
- Page 145
- Page 146
- Page 147
- Page 148
- Page 149
- Page 150
- Page 151
- Page 152
- Page 153
- Page 154
- Page 155
- Page 156
- Page 157
- Page 158
- Page 159
- Page 160
- Page 161
- Page 162
- Page 163
- Page 164
- Page 165
- Page 166