Page 106
Story: The First Gentleman
“Thank you, Doctor. No further questions.”
Judge Dow turns to Tess Hardy. She’s already on her feet. The first thing she does is click off the video screen.
“Good morning, Dr. Woods.”
“Good morning.”
“Dr. Woods, let’s return to this mysterious little hyoid bone. Isn’t it true that a hyoid bone can be fractured by impact in a car accident, by hard contact in an athletic event, or even by violent vomiting?”
“Yes, but I saw no evidence of—”
“Violent vomiting? There would be no evidence of that in skeletal remains, correct?”
“Vomiting? No.”
“So when you make an educated guess that the victim was strangled–”
“Objection!” Bastinelli interjects. “Defense is mischaracterizing the witness’s testimony.”
“Sustained,” says Dow.
I watch Hardy shift gears in a flash. “So when you came to anopinionthat the victim was strangled, you did not consider other possibilities, is that right?”
“I used my best judgment,” says Woods.
“But it’s possible that the victim’s hyoid bone was fractured in a mannerotherthan strangulation, correct?”
“Yes. It’s possible,” Dr. Woods concedes.
“Thank you, Doctor. I’m glad we could put that to rest.”
Hardy goes over and whispers to her client. I watch him give an almost imperceptible nod. The defense attorney walks to the lectern and picks up a stapled set of pages. “Now I’d like to turn your attention to your preliminary autopsy report. Your Honor, this is defendant’s exhibit twelve B.”
She flips through the pages until she reaches a highlighted section. I can see the neon-green color from where I’m sitting.
“Dr. Woods, you offered an opinion that the victim was pregnant at the time of her death.”
An undercurrent of surprised murmuring rolls through thecourtroom. It’s not the first time I’ve heard this pregnancy theory, but I’m surprised that Hardy is the one to bring it up. What does this mean for the defense’s trial strategy?
“That’s right,” Dr. Woods says.
“But there were no fetal remains? No way to check for fetal DNA?”
“Correct.”
“And you were unable to extract placental DNA from the bones?”
“True.”
“So what, in your expert opinion, makes you think that the victim was with child?”
Dr. Woods doesn’t immediately respond. She seems to be organizing her thoughts. She looks over at the jury, then speaks directly to them.
“When a woman becomes pregnant, the body undergoes physical changes to prepare for delivery. By the start of the second trimester, ligaments attached to bones in the pelvis start to loosen. That causes changes in the composition of the bones in those areas that we can see under a microscope. I saw evidence of those changes in the pelvic bones of the victim.”
“Conclusive evidence?” Hardy asks.
“That might be overstating it.”
Judge Dow turns to Tess Hardy. She’s already on her feet. The first thing she does is click off the video screen.
“Good morning, Dr. Woods.”
“Good morning.”
“Dr. Woods, let’s return to this mysterious little hyoid bone. Isn’t it true that a hyoid bone can be fractured by impact in a car accident, by hard contact in an athletic event, or even by violent vomiting?”
“Yes, but I saw no evidence of—”
“Violent vomiting? There would be no evidence of that in skeletal remains, correct?”
“Vomiting? No.”
“So when you make an educated guess that the victim was strangled–”
“Objection!” Bastinelli interjects. “Defense is mischaracterizing the witness’s testimony.”
“Sustained,” says Dow.
I watch Hardy shift gears in a flash. “So when you came to anopinionthat the victim was strangled, you did not consider other possibilities, is that right?”
“I used my best judgment,” says Woods.
“But it’s possible that the victim’s hyoid bone was fractured in a mannerotherthan strangulation, correct?”
“Yes. It’s possible,” Dr. Woods concedes.
“Thank you, Doctor. I’m glad we could put that to rest.”
Hardy goes over and whispers to her client. I watch him give an almost imperceptible nod. The defense attorney walks to the lectern and picks up a stapled set of pages. “Now I’d like to turn your attention to your preliminary autopsy report. Your Honor, this is defendant’s exhibit twelve B.”
She flips through the pages until she reaches a highlighted section. I can see the neon-green color from where I’m sitting.
“Dr. Woods, you offered an opinion that the victim was pregnant at the time of her death.”
An undercurrent of surprised murmuring rolls through thecourtroom. It’s not the first time I’ve heard this pregnancy theory, but I’m surprised that Hardy is the one to bring it up. What does this mean for the defense’s trial strategy?
“That’s right,” Dr. Woods says.
“But there were no fetal remains? No way to check for fetal DNA?”
“Correct.”
“And you were unable to extract placental DNA from the bones?”
“True.”
“So what, in your expert opinion, makes you think that the victim was with child?”
Dr. Woods doesn’t immediately respond. She seems to be organizing her thoughts. She looks over at the jury, then speaks directly to them.
“When a woman becomes pregnant, the body undergoes physical changes to prepare for delivery. By the start of the second trimester, ligaments attached to bones in the pelvis start to loosen. That causes changes in the composition of the bones in those areas that we can see under a microscope. I saw evidence of those changes in the pelvic bones of the victim.”
“Conclusive evidence?” Hardy asks.
“That might be overstating it.”
Table of Contents
- Page 1
- Page 2
- Page 3
- Page 4
- Page 5
- Page 6
- Page 7
- Page 8
- Page 9
- Page 10
- Page 11
- Page 12
- Page 13
- Page 14
- Page 15
- Page 16
- Page 17
- Page 18
- Page 19
- Page 20
- Page 21
- Page 22
- Page 23
- Page 24
- Page 25
- Page 26
- Page 27
- Page 28
- Page 29
- Page 30
- Page 31
- Page 32
- Page 33
- Page 34
- Page 35
- Page 36
- Page 37
- Page 38
- Page 39
- Page 40
- Page 41
- Page 42
- Page 43
- Page 44
- Page 45
- Page 46
- Page 47
- Page 48
- Page 49
- Page 50
- Page 51
- Page 52
- Page 53
- Page 54
- Page 55
- Page 56
- Page 57
- Page 58
- Page 59
- Page 60
- Page 61
- Page 62
- Page 63
- Page 64
- Page 65
- Page 66
- Page 67
- Page 68
- Page 69
- Page 70
- Page 71
- Page 72
- Page 73
- Page 74
- Page 75
- Page 76
- Page 77
- Page 78
- Page 79
- Page 80
- Page 81
- Page 82
- Page 83
- Page 84
- Page 85
- Page 86
- Page 87
- Page 88
- Page 89
- Page 90
- Page 91
- Page 92
- Page 93
- Page 94
- Page 95
- Page 96
- Page 97
- Page 98
- Page 99
- Page 100
- Page 101
- Page 102
- Page 103
- Page 104
- Page 105
- Page 106
- Page 107
- Page 108
- Page 109
- Page 110
- Page 111
- Page 112
- Page 113
- Page 114
- Page 115
- Page 116
- Page 117
- Page 118
- Page 119
- Page 120
- Page 121
- Page 122
- Page 123
- Page 124
- Page 125
- Page 126
- Page 127
- Page 128
- Page 129
- Page 130
- Page 131
- Page 132
- Page 133
- Page 134
- Page 135
- Page 136
- Page 137
- Page 138
- Page 139
- Page 140
- Page 141
- Page 142
- Page 143
- Page 144
- Page 145
- Page 146
- Page 147
- Page 148
- Page 149
- Page 150
- Page 151
- Page 152
- Page 153
- Page 154
- Page 155
- Page 156
- Page 157