Page 3
Chapter 2
Eighteen months later. The Morgan Soames Hour television studio, London
Thelights were set to run hot, the interview was running hotter.
Too hot.
Far hotter than had been anticipated.
‘It’s too controversial,’ the studio owner had said all those weeks ago.
‘I prefer “provocative”,’ the director, a woman called Justine Webb, had replied.
‘We’ll get hundreds, maybe thousands of complaints.’
‘It’ll be a ratings smash.’
‘I’m not sure.’
‘And I have the final say on editorial content. We’re doing this.’
There’d been meetings and committees long before the director and the owner had had their dance, of course. Where Kane Hunt was involved, this was to be expected. Controversy – all of it carefully curated – followed Hunt wherever he went. Live TV appearances were increasingly rare.
ButThe Morgan Soames Hourhad never shied from controversy.
In the end it came down to two things: their commitment to balanced news and whether or not their presenter, Morgan Soames, would be able to handle him.
The argument for balance went like this: Saffron Phipps was due on the week before the proposed Hunt interview, and her views, albeit from the opposite end of the spectrum, were equally as extreme. Phipps argued that Valerie Solanas, the author of the 1967SCUM Manifesto, had been on to something. Phipps wasn’t suggesting, as Solanas had, that men should be eliminated. But shewasarguing that Solanas had been correct when she wrote that, because men only had one X chromosome, they were genetically deficient, incomplete females. This deficiency explained why males were emotionally limited, egocentric, lacking in empathy and unable to relate to anything other than their own physical sensations. Kane Hunt was the anti-Phipps, the counterpoint to theSCUM Manifesto. He would provide the balanceThe Morgan Soames Hourprided itself on.
For thoseagainst, the argument was far less nuanced – Kane Hunt was a misogynist who spouted his vile philosophy, not because he genuinely believed that men had a fundamental right to sex, but because it sold books. Having him on the show would give his new book a major marketing boost.
On the second point, whether Morgan Soames would be able to handle him, there had been no disagreement. She had the biggest pair of balls in any room she was in.
It was settled with a vote – the first one the production team had ever had over a guest. Justine, the director, voted no. She was responsible for the way the show was shot and it would be her dealing with the inevitable fallout. The head writer said no, too. He didn’t want to put his staff in the lion’s mouth if Morgan ended up looking foolish.
The social media manager couldn’t say yes fast enough, of course. She knew an upcoming Twitter storm when she saw one. The television channel said yes, too. Ratings would rocket and they would cash in.
The rest of the production team was evenly split. Allan, the show’s producer, had had the casting vote. In his heart he’d wanted to say yes. Whatever that little twerp Kane Hunt’s views were on women, Morgan was an apex predator. She would eat Hunt alive and 99.9 per cent of the country would rejoice when she did. And itwouldbe relevant – for too long Hunt had been getting a free ride. His claim of media censorship was a calculated strategy. If he were outrageous enough, he could never appear on television, and if he were never on television his views couldn’t be challenged. Censorship was the shield he cowered behind. He coveted it because he relied on it.
But Morgan had been taunting him for months. Every opening monologue of her show began with a dig at him. Every closing piece ended with him being the butt of a joke.
She had been daring him to appear.
To the surprise of everyone, Hunt had said yes. Publicly. He would appear on her show as long as it was one-to-one and he was given the questions beforehand. Morgan didn’t play that way, though. She would give him time to answer, but he didn’t get to dictate the direction. Hunt had reluctantly agreed. If he backtracked now, he knew Morgan would laugh about it for years.
So Allan had wanted Kane Hunt on the show.
But he had voted no. Allan’s surname was Webb, the same as Justine’s, and that was because they were married. They had worked together for twenty years and had been husband and wife for ten. They were a team both on and off the pitch. Professionally and personally, his job was to have her back.
It fell to Justine to let Morgan know. She had decided to tell her shortly before that night’s show, hoping it might limit the amount of time for abuse. Morgan had interviewed impeached presidents and disgraced prime ministers. She’d trapped royals in lies and reduced war criminals to tears. She wasn’t a woman to mess with.
Justine had knocked on her dressing-room door and entered. Morgan had been in makeup, her stylist, and long-time sounding board, fussing around her hair with a tiny brush and a small bottle of spray. Tissue wedged between her neck and the collar protected her two-thousand-pound navy blue Oscar de la Renta bell-sleeve blazer from the harsh studio makeup she had to wear. Off camera she looked like a supervillain,oncamera she would look perfect.
Morgan had turned, fixed Justine with those steely grey eyes and gave her a reverse head nod. Her auburn hair, rich and glowing, didn’t move.
‘Quick word, Morgs?’ Justine had said.
‘Shoot,’ she’d said. ‘Just rehearsing tonight’s monologue. Want to get in one more joke about the PM standing in dog shit yesterday.’
Table of Contents
- Page 1
- Page 2
- Page 3 (Reading here)
- Page 4
- Page 5
- Page 6
- Page 7
- Page 8
- Page 9
- Page 10
- Page 11
- Page 12
- Page 13
- Page 14
- Page 15
- Page 16
- Page 17
- Page 18
- Page 19
- Page 20
- Page 21
- Page 22
- Page 23
- Page 24
- Page 25
- Page 26
- Page 27
- Page 28
- Page 29
- Page 30
- Page 31
- Page 32
- Page 33
- Page 34
- Page 35
- Page 36
- Page 37
- Page 38
- Page 39
- Page 40
- Page 41
- Page 42
- Page 43
- Page 44
- Page 45
- Page 46
- Page 47
- Page 48
- Page 49
- Page 50
- Page 51
- Page 52
- Page 53
- Page 54
- Page 55
- Page 56
- Page 57
- Page 58
- Page 59
- Page 60
- Page 61
- Page 62
- Page 63
- Page 64
- Page 65
- Page 66
- Page 67
- Page 68
- Page 69
- Page 70
- Page 71
- Page 72
- Page 73
- Page 74
- Page 75
- Page 76
- Page 77
- Page 78
- Page 79
- Page 80
- Page 81
- Page 82
- Page 83
- Page 84
- Page 85
- Page 86
- Page 87
- Page 88
- Page 89
- Page 90
- Page 91
- Page 92
- Page 93
- Page 94
- Page 95
- Page 96
- Page 97
- Page 98
- Page 99
- Page 100
- Page 101
- Page 102
- Page 103
- Page 104
- Page 105
- Page 106
- Page 107
- Page 108
- Page 109
- Page 110
- Page 111
- Page 112
- Page 113
- Page 114
- Page 115
- Page 116
- Page 117
- Page 118
- Page 119
- Page 120
- Page 121
- Page 122
- Page 123
- Page 124
- Page 125
- Page 126
- Page 127
- Page 128
- Page 129
- Page 130
- Page 131
- Page 132
- Page 133
- Page 134
- Page 135
- Page 136
- Page 137
- Page 138
- Page 139
- Page 140
- Page 141
- Page 142
- Page 143
- Page 144
- Page 145
- Page 146
- Page 147
- Page 148
- Page 149
- Page 150
- Page 151
- Page 152
- Page 153
- Page 154
- Page 155
- Page 156
- Page 157
- Page 158
- Page 159
- Page 160
- Page 161
- Page 162
- Page 163
- Page 164
- Page 165
- Page 166
- Page 167
- Page 168
- Page 169
- Page 170
- Page 171
- Page 172
- Page 173
- Page 174
- Page 175
- Page 176
- Page 177
- Page 178
- Page 179
- Page 180
- Page 181
- Page 182
- Page 183
- Page 184
- Page 185
- Page 186
- Page 187
- Page 188
- Page 189
- Page 190
- Page 191
- Page 192
- Page 193
- Page 194
- Page 195
- Page 196
- Page 197
- Page 198
- Page 199
- Page 200
- Page 201
- Page 202
- Page 203
- Page 204
- Page 205
- Page 206
- Page 207
- Page 208
- Page 209
- Page 210
- Page 211
- Page 212
- Page 213
- Page 214
- Page 215
- Page 216
- Page 217
- Page 218
- Page 219
- Page 220
- Page 221
- Page 222
- Page 223
- Page 224
- Page 225
- Page 226
- Page 227
- Page 228
- Page 229
- Page 230
- Page 231