Page 82 of Twisted Pact
The admission feels strange coming from my mouth, like saying the words makes it more real than Dr. Orlov’s examination did. More permanent than the shocked look on Mila’s face when I suggested we get married.
“Jesus Christ, Alexei. Do you have any idea what this means for the family? For our alliance negotiations? For your future with her?”
The rapid-fire questions flare irritation in my chest. Dmitri’s mind went to political implications. Not once did he ask how I feel about becoming a father or whether this is something I wanted.
“It means I’m going to be a father.”
“You’re thinking with your chest, not your head. This is political, not personal. Your attachment makes you a target.”
He pauses. “You need to be prepared for that.”
I resume pacing, wearing a path in the carpet between my desk and the wall. Each step feels like a small release of pressure.
“When’s the last time you made a decision that didn’t factor in her safety first?”
The question detonates between us because we both know the answer. Every choice I’ve made since the restaurant incident has prioritized Mila’s protection over broader family interests. Every resource allocation, security protocol, and strategic decision.
“That’s what I thought,” Dmitri continues when I don’t respond. “You’re no longer thinking like a leader. You’re thinking like a man in love, and that makes both families vulnerable if you don’t at least acknowledge it and pivot.”
The word “love” twists something in my gut. He’s right, even though neither of us has said it out loud. What I feel for Mila has moved far beyond physical attraction. It’s become something that influences every aspect of how I approach leadership.
“Both families benefit from this alliance,” I point out.
“Both families benefit from rational leadership, not from decisions made to protect one person at the expense of everyone else.”
“I’m not sacrificing anyone.”
But even as I say it, I know that’s not true. I am sacrificing objectivity, strategic flexibility, and the ability to makedecisions based on organizational benefit rather than personal attachment.
My phone beeps before I can respond, cutting through our argument with an electronic intrusion that feels almost welcome. Boris is on the other end, calling with what I assume is the intelligence update I requested earlier.
“We’ll finish this later,” I tell Dmitri before answering the other call.
“Intelligence reports are ready,” Boris says. “Multiple families have learned about the pregnancy through their networks.”
The temperature in the room drops several degrees despite the climate control. This is faster than I anticipated.
“How?”
I sink into my chair and reach for a pen, needing something to do with my hands while processing what this means for every security protocol we’ve established.
“Medical records. Surveillance of Dr. Orlov’s movements. Electronic intercepts of our communications. Information like this doesn’t stay contained.”
Of course, it doesn’t. Privacy is an illusion in criminal organizations, where information equals power and leverage equals survival.
“Which families?”
He starts listing them as I take notes, writing down names and drawing connections between organizations that normally compete. The fact that they’re sharing intelligence suggests coordination that goes beyond normal business relationships.
“Their response?”
“Coordinated planning sessions. Resource sharing. They’re treating this as an opportunity to exploit what they perceive as your weakness.”
The word “weakness” makes me jam my pen harder against the paper, nearly tearing through to the desk beneath. These bastards think my feelings for Mila make me vulnerable to manipulation and control.
“They think attacking Dmitri’s wife would guarantee their destruction,” Boris continues. “But your relationship with Mila is different. You’re not married yet. She’s not family. They believe they can target her to send a message without signing their own death warrants.”
The casual way he describes their logic makes rage build in my chest. These families think they can determine acceptable levels of violence against the woman carrying my child.
Table of Contents
- Page 1
- Page 2
- Page 3
- Page 4
- Page 5
- Page 6
- Page 7
- Page 8
- Page 9
- Page 10
- Page 11
- Page 12
- Page 13
- Page 14
- Page 15
- Page 16
- Page 17
- Page 18
- Page 19
- Page 20
- Page 21
- Page 22
- Page 23
- Page 24
- Page 25
- Page 26
- Page 27
- Page 28
- Page 29
- Page 30
- Page 31
- Page 32
- Page 33
- Page 34
- Page 35
- Page 36
- Page 37
- Page 38
- Page 39
- Page 40
- Page 41
- Page 42
- Page 43
- Page 44
- Page 45
- Page 46
- Page 47
- Page 48
- Page 49
- Page 50
- Page 51
- Page 52
- Page 53
- Page 54
- Page 55
- Page 56
- Page 57
- Page 58
- Page 59
- Page 60
- Page 61
- Page 62
- Page 63
- Page 64
- Page 65
- Page 66
- Page 67
- Page 68
- Page 69
- Page 70
- Page 71
- Page 72
- Page 73
- Page 74
- Page 75
- Page 76
- Page 77
- Page 78
- Page 79
- Page 80
- Page 81
- Page 82 (reading here)
- Page 83
- Page 84
- Page 85
- Page 86
- Page 87
- Page 88
- Page 89
- Page 90
- Page 91
- Page 92
- Page 93
- Page 94
- Page 95
- Page 96
- Page 97
- Page 98
- Page 99
- Page 100
- Page 101
- Page 102
- Page 103
- Page 104
- Page 105
- Page 106
- Page 107
- Page 108
- Page 109
- Page 110
- Page 111
- Page 112
- Page 113
- Page 114
- Page 115
- Page 116
- Page 117
- Page 118
- Page 119
- Page 120
- Page 121
- Page 122
- Page 123
- Page 124
- Page 125
- Page 126
- Page 127
- Page 128
- Page 129
- Page 130
- Page 131
- Page 132
- Page 133
- Page 134
- Page 135
- Page 136
- Page 137
- Page 138
- Page 139
- Page 140
- Page 141
- Page 142
- Page 143
- Page 144
- Page 145
- Page 146
- Page 147
- Page 148
- Page 149