Page 136 of The Proving Ground
“Does it signify the twenty-third of May 2014, when a man named Elliot Rodger, an incel like yourself, killed several young women outside a sorority house in—”
“Objection!” the Mason brothers exclaimed in unison.
The judge pointed across the bench at me.
“Not another word, Mr. Haller,” she barked.
I raised my hands, palms up, in surrender. The judge then sent the jury out for an early lunch and instructed the lawyers to follow her to chambers. We did so silently, because we were close on thejudge’s heels. As we entered her chambers, she shook off the black robe and, with sharp, angry moves, put it on a hanger and hooked it on the coatrack. She then turned and fixed me with a withering stare.
“Mr. Haller, what the hell do you think you’re doing, provoking a witness like that?” she asked. “And making an inflammatory statement in front of the jury?”
I held my hands up again, this time in what I hoped was a calming manner. I spoke without raising my voice.
“‘I don’t even know what they are,’” I said. “I believe those were the exact words the witness said when I asked about two well-known and established sites frequented by men who advocate violence against women.”
“Oh my God, what bullshit,” Marcus Mason said.
We were all still standing, too upset for different reasons to sit down.
“Language, Mr. Mason,” Ruhlin said. “Mr. Haller, where are you going with this?”
“Your Honor, the witness is an incel,” I said. “His misogyny and other biases infected the programming of Project Clair and directly led to Wren espousing those views to Aaron Colton. He then—”
“And you can prove this?” Ruhlin asked.
I didn’t hesitate.
“By the time we get to rebuttal, I’ll be able to prove it,” I said. “The username wiseacre-twenty-three is all over screen captures from those sites going back at least seven years. I have a digital linguistics expert comparing the wording of those posts to those Whittaker just acknowledged posting on Reddit. I walked him right into it. It’s him, and his bias is that he hates women. That hate ended up in the code in Clair. Garbage in, garbage out, Your Honor. Hate in, hate out. You end up with a chatbot that says, ‘Get rid of her.’”
Both Masons looked ashen. Both knew, as did the judge, that everycase hit a point of no return, when the pendulum has swung too far to one side or the other and is not coming back. This was that point.
Mitchell was the first to recover and respond. Weakly.
“Your Honor, counsel has obviously crossed so many lines in the rules of discovery that these questions cannot be allowed,” he said.
“It didn’t become discoverable until Whittaker sat up there and lied on the stand,” I said. “I’d be happy to turn over copies of his hate screeds after lunch.”
“You mentioned something called Dirty-four,” Ruhlin said. “What is that?”
“It was a site on the dark web that was shut down by law enforcement four years ago,” I said. “Subscribers could download the identities of women whose DNA carried a genetic combination linked to promiscuity and risky lifestyles.”
“This is pure science fiction,” Marcus Mason said.
“The FBI didn’t think so after several murders were linked to the site,” I said.
“And you have evidence that this witness was involved?” Ruhlin asked.
“I have evidence that wiseacre-twenty-three was a subscriber,” I said.
There was no comeback from either of the Masons. Even the judge was silent for a long moment before looking directly at the twins and speaking.
“In light of these developments, I believe you two need to huddle with your client,” she said. “I’ll have the deputy marshals pass the word to the jurors that we are in recess until nine o’clock tomorrow morning. You’ll have till then to determine whether we continue the trial with this witness… or not.”
She paused to see if there would be any pushback from the Masons. They offered none.
“Very well, then,” she said. “You may all go.”
We did the silent single-file exit again, the Masons leading the way with their heads down. When we got to the courtroom, Marcus Mason started gathering his folders and notepads from the defense table. He spoke without looking at me.
Table of Contents
- Page 1
- Page 2
- Page 3
- Page 4
- Page 5
- Page 6
- Page 7
- Page 8
- Page 9
- Page 10
- Page 11
- Page 12
- Page 13
- Page 14
- Page 15
- Page 16
- Page 17
- Page 18
- Page 19
- Page 20
- Page 21
- Page 22
- Page 23
- Page 24
- Page 25
- Page 26
- Page 27
- Page 28
- Page 29
- Page 30
- Page 31
- Page 32
- Page 33
- Page 34
- Page 35
- Page 36
- Page 37
- Page 38
- Page 39
- Page 40
- Page 41
- Page 42
- Page 43
- Page 44
- Page 45
- Page 46
- Page 47
- Page 48
- Page 49
- Page 50
- Page 51
- Page 52
- Page 53
- Page 54
- Page 55
- Page 56
- Page 57
- Page 58
- Page 59
- Page 60
- Page 61
- Page 62
- Page 63
- Page 64
- Page 65
- Page 66
- Page 67
- Page 68
- Page 69
- Page 70
- Page 71
- Page 72
- Page 73
- Page 74
- Page 75
- Page 76
- Page 77
- Page 78
- Page 79
- Page 80
- Page 81
- Page 82
- Page 83
- Page 84
- Page 85
- Page 86
- Page 87
- Page 88
- Page 89
- Page 90
- Page 91
- Page 92
- Page 93
- Page 94
- Page 95
- Page 96
- Page 97
- Page 98
- Page 99
- Page 100
- Page 101
- Page 102
- Page 103
- Page 104
- Page 105
- Page 106
- Page 107
- Page 108
- Page 109
- Page 110
- Page 111
- Page 112
- Page 113
- Page 114
- Page 115
- Page 116
- Page 117
- Page 118
- Page 119
- Page 120
- Page 121
- Page 122
- Page 123
- Page 124
- Page 125
- Page 126
- Page 127
- Page 128
- Page 129
- Page 130
- Page 131
- Page 132
- Page 133
- Page 134
- Page 135
- Page 136 (reading here)
- Page 137
- Page 138
- Page 139
- Page 140
- Page 141
- Page 142
- Page 143