Page 77
Story: Ship Happens
ETHAN
ONE LAST CONFRONTATION
“... a
nd joining us today are Ethan Cole, CEO of Cole Tech Industries, and Dr. Harper Bennett, environmental scientist and author of the recently published assessment of Cole Tech’s cruise operations. Thank you both for being here.”
The Bloomberg studio lights are uncomfortably hot, but I maintain my composure as Harper and I sit side by side for what will undoubtedly be the most personally revealing interview of my life.
“Thank you for having us,” I reply, hyper-aware of Harper beside me in another gorgeous outfit—navy this time, her auburn hair framing her face in soft waves. She looks confident, professional, and captivating.
“Dr. Bennett, your latest piece has generated a lot of attention for its unusually balanced approach,” the interviewer begins. “What led to this change in methodology?”
Harper sits straighter “My goal was to document what I observed—both the concerning practices and the conservation efforts. Anything less would undermine the integrity of the work.”
I watch her. Even knowing what’s coming—the inevitable pivot to our personal relationship—I’m struck by her confidence.
“Mr. Cole, this level of transparency is unusual for a corporation of Cole Tech’s size. What prompted you to open your operations to such thorough external scrutiny?”
“We have nothing to hide,” I answer. “Dr. Bennett’s reputation for the truth and uncompromising standards made her the ideal person to show that. We wanted insight, not a public relations exercise.”
“Even knowing her history of criticizing Cole Tech’s environmental practices?” the interviewer probes.
“Especially because of that,” I acknowledge with a small smile. “We knew she wouldn’t go easy on us.”
The interviewer nods, then comes the pivot we’ve been expecting.
“Reports suggest your relationship got more personal during this process. Dr. Bennett, in your CNBC interview yesterday, you mentioned developing a ‘personal connection’ with Mr. Cole. Could you elaborate on how your interaction changed from your initial, rather famous confrontation to your current collaboration?”
Here it is—the moment of truth. Harper and I discussed this last night, agreeing on complete honesty without unnecessary details. Still, I hold my breath as Harper comes up with her response.
“I thought Cole Tech was trying to influence my findings, and not knowing Mr. Cole I was antagonistic,” she begins with a hint of a smile. “I had preconceptions about Mr., and he had preconceptions about me. The process of working together helped us to move beyond those assumptions.”
“And working together led to...?” the interviewer pushes.
Harper glances at me before continuing. “It led to us working together, without tossing drinks in faces.”
“Mr. Cole, would you characterize your current relationship with Dr. Bennett as only professional?” The question is direct, as we knew it would be.
“No, I wouldn’t,” I reply. “But I don’t think my current relationship with Dr. Bennet is relevant, do you?”
There—it’s done. Not stating “we’re dating” but clear enough that no one could misinterpret.
“To clarify,” the interviewer keeps going, “you and Dr. Bennett are involved romantically, even though she published this critical assessment of your company?”
Harper takes this question, as we’d agreed. “Yes, we are. My job is to call out corporations, but they are corporations, Mr. Cole is one man in a much bigger organization.”
“Wasn’t there concern about conflict of interest?”
“Of course,” I interject. “But there is no conflict, just nosy people looking for some scandal.”
“If anything,” Harper adds, “our personal connection made me much harder on Cole Tech than any other organization.”
By the time the interview concludes, we’ve accomplished what we intended, an honest acknowledgment of our relationship.
“That wasn’t so bad,” Harper murmurs as we’re escorted from the studio, microphones removed.
“You were brilliant,” I tell her
ONE LAST CONFRONTATION
“... a
nd joining us today are Ethan Cole, CEO of Cole Tech Industries, and Dr. Harper Bennett, environmental scientist and author of the recently published assessment of Cole Tech’s cruise operations. Thank you both for being here.”
The Bloomberg studio lights are uncomfortably hot, but I maintain my composure as Harper and I sit side by side for what will undoubtedly be the most personally revealing interview of my life.
“Thank you for having us,” I reply, hyper-aware of Harper beside me in another gorgeous outfit—navy this time, her auburn hair framing her face in soft waves. She looks confident, professional, and captivating.
“Dr. Bennett, your latest piece has generated a lot of attention for its unusually balanced approach,” the interviewer begins. “What led to this change in methodology?”
Harper sits straighter “My goal was to document what I observed—both the concerning practices and the conservation efforts. Anything less would undermine the integrity of the work.”
I watch her. Even knowing what’s coming—the inevitable pivot to our personal relationship—I’m struck by her confidence.
“Mr. Cole, this level of transparency is unusual for a corporation of Cole Tech’s size. What prompted you to open your operations to such thorough external scrutiny?”
“We have nothing to hide,” I answer. “Dr. Bennett’s reputation for the truth and uncompromising standards made her the ideal person to show that. We wanted insight, not a public relations exercise.”
“Even knowing her history of criticizing Cole Tech’s environmental practices?” the interviewer probes.
“Especially because of that,” I acknowledge with a small smile. “We knew she wouldn’t go easy on us.”
The interviewer nods, then comes the pivot we’ve been expecting.
“Reports suggest your relationship got more personal during this process. Dr. Bennett, in your CNBC interview yesterday, you mentioned developing a ‘personal connection’ with Mr. Cole. Could you elaborate on how your interaction changed from your initial, rather famous confrontation to your current collaboration?”
Here it is—the moment of truth. Harper and I discussed this last night, agreeing on complete honesty without unnecessary details. Still, I hold my breath as Harper comes up with her response.
“I thought Cole Tech was trying to influence my findings, and not knowing Mr. Cole I was antagonistic,” she begins with a hint of a smile. “I had preconceptions about Mr., and he had preconceptions about me. The process of working together helped us to move beyond those assumptions.”
“And working together led to...?” the interviewer pushes.
Harper glances at me before continuing. “It led to us working together, without tossing drinks in faces.”
“Mr. Cole, would you characterize your current relationship with Dr. Bennett as only professional?” The question is direct, as we knew it would be.
“No, I wouldn’t,” I reply. “But I don’t think my current relationship with Dr. Bennet is relevant, do you?”
There—it’s done. Not stating “we’re dating” but clear enough that no one could misinterpret.
“To clarify,” the interviewer keeps going, “you and Dr. Bennett are involved romantically, even though she published this critical assessment of your company?”
Harper takes this question, as we’d agreed. “Yes, we are. My job is to call out corporations, but they are corporations, Mr. Cole is one man in a much bigger organization.”
“Wasn’t there concern about conflict of interest?”
“Of course,” I interject. “But there is no conflict, just nosy people looking for some scandal.”
“If anything,” Harper adds, “our personal connection made me much harder on Cole Tech than any other organization.”
By the time the interview concludes, we’ve accomplished what we intended, an honest acknowledgment of our relationship.
“That wasn’t so bad,” Harper murmurs as we’re escorted from the studio, microphones removed.
“You were brilliant,” I tell her
Table of Contents
- Page 1
- Page 2
- Page 3
- Page 4
- Page 5
- Page 6
- Page 7
- Page 8
- Page 9
- Page 10
- Page 11
- Page 12
- Page 13
- Page 14
- Page 15
- Page 16
- Page 17
- Page 18
- Page 19
- Page 20
- Page 21
- Page 22
- Page 23
- Page 24
- Page 25
- Page 26
- Page 27
- Page 28
- Page 29
- Page 30
- Page 31
- Page 32
- Page 33
- Page 34
- Page 35
- Page 36
- Page 37
- Page 38
- Page 39
- Page 40
- Page 41
- Page 42
- Page 43
- Page 44
- Page 45
- Page 46
- Page 47
- Page 48
- Page 49
- Page 50
- Page 51
- Page 52
- Page 53
- Page 54
- Page 55
- Page 56
- Page 57
- Page 58
- Page 59
- Page 60
- Page 61
- Page 62
- Page 63
- Page 64
- Page 65
- Page 66
- Page 67
- Page 68
- Page 69
- Page 70
- Page 71
- Page 72
- Page 73
- Page 74
- Page 75
- Page 76
- Page 77
- Page 78
- Page 79
- Page 80